Home » Hanafi Fiqh » Askimam.org » One mobile costs rs 30000 in india and 10000 in us but inU.S it is tied with a telecom service provider due to which such a discount is available the…

One mobile costs rs 30000 in india and 10000 in us but inU.S it is tied with a telecom service provider due to which such a discount is available the…

Answered as per Hanafi Fiqh by Askimam.org

One mobile costs rs 30000 in india and 10000 in us but inU.S it is tied with a telecom service provider  due to which such a discount is available the telecom service provider gives the mobile on the condition that the person will use the mobile with the particular service provider for two years . So my question is can I smuggle the phone from  and use it india as in the process I will be saving Rs20000


In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

Assalaamu `alaykum waRahmatullahi Wabarakatuh

At the outset it should be understood that in principle, a Muslim is one who fulfils his promise. This is a hallmark of a true believer. Allah Ta’ala states in the Holy Quran:

وَأَوْفُوا بِالْعَهْدِ إِنَّ الْعَهْدَ كَانَ مَسْئُولًا


“And fulfil the covenant; indeed, the covenant will be questioned (in the hereafter).”

(Al Quran Surah Isra v34.)

Purchasing a mobile phone on a contract basis, (ie. The sale of the mobile phone is tied to a two year contract for example) binds the purchaser to the terms and conditions in that contract. Legal action could be taken against the purchaser failing to comply by these conditions; more seriously, one will be held responsible in the court of Almighty Allah for such negligence. Allah states in the Holy Quran:


يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ  كَبُرَ مَقْتًا عِنْدَ اللَّهِ أَنْ تَقُولُوا مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ

“Oh those who believe, why do you say that which you do not do? It invites Allah’s anger that you say what you do not do.” (Al Quran.Surah Saff. v2)

Merely taking a mobile phone on a contract basis to get the discounted price and not complying with the terms and conditions and thereafter taking off with the phone is a serious crime. This is not the trait of a believer; instead it is a trait of a hypocrite.

Rasululah صلى الله عليه و سلمsaid:

عن أبي هريرة عن النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم قال آية المنافق ثلاث إذا حدث كذب وإذا وعد أخلف وإذا اؤتمن خان 

  “The (distinguishing) signs of a hypocrite are three: When he speaks, he lies. When he promises, he breaks it and when he is given something as trust, he breaches that trust.”

(Bukhari vol1 p16 Darul Fikr)

Therefore, it is not permissible to take a mobile phone on contract whilst dodging the terms and conditions.

 Such fraudulent actions are against human integrity and morality. One who perpetrates these deeds will be answerable and sinful. A true believer will not sell his honour for a few Rupees.


And Allah knows best

Wassalamu Alaikum

Ml. Zakariyya bin Ahmed,
Student Darul Iftaa

Checked and Approved by:

Mufti Ebrahim Desai
Darul Iftaa, Madrassah In’aamiyyah

Original Source Link

This answer was collected from Askimam.org, which is operated under the supervision of Mufti Ebrahim Desai from South Africa.

Read answers with similar topics:

Random Q&A

 Queries related to Inheritance: Scenario – A man left behind his wife, 3 daughters and 1 son after his death. He left behind a plot in which from one side a house is built and another side is vacant. Now this property is up for distribution among all the stake holders of it; however the same property was used as source of income in various different ways till today by his wife and son for 20 year (approx). Till date the maintenance charge of the property was born by the wife and son only. Question 1 – The Total income earned by the property should be declared or not in front of man’s daughters? Whether it should be divide equally or not?Scenario – The wife is also getting pension till date as her husband was a retired government officer.  I believe she is fully entitled to use this money for herself. Question 2 – However, If she is left with some part of this money then whether she is entitled to give this money only to his son or equally divide this among her children? Scenario – The mother wishes to distribute her part of the property and give it to her son and 2 daughters (as the 3rd (youngest) daughter is dead now) which she has received from her husband’s inheritance. Question 3 – Whether she should divide this in 2:1 ration or she should divide this in 3 equal parts as this is a gift not an inheritance? Scenario – The wife has also received property from her parental side in inheritance. Question 4 – Is she entitled to give this property only to his son or she should divide this equally among her children? Scenario – In last few years the wife is not keeping well and the Son is taking full care of her as she wishes to be with him. She is also totally dependent on him because of her illness.  Question 5 – Does this scenario changes anything in the distribution of the property? If yes then in which sense or case? Please give an example. Question 6 – If the 2 daughters feels that her mother’s (earlier referred as wife) decision while distributing her own property is being influenced by her Son as she is living with him and totally dependent on him then how to proceed further? Scenario – The Son who stays with his family and Mother at the same place is not ready to sell his part of the property. He wants to keep the full house however the daughters want to sell their part. Question 7 – Now if the Son decides to keep his part; the property will be sold in pieces which will reduces the total value of the property and the daughters will get around 20-25% less value for their share. Is it correct? Question 8 – Do we need to consider the value of the house as well while distributing the property as the house is going to stay with the son only? Scenario – The Son is claiming the full house which is built on the same land as he is staying there from the beginning with his Mother. Total property 97×78=7566sq.ft. , Son’s share 3222.82sq.ft. (Including the share given by his Mother from her share), built up area of the House is 61×40=2440sq.ft.  Question 9 – Now if the Son takes this house then he will take that part of land which will be in even* rectangular form and because of this the daughters will be getting the part of the land in uneven* rectangular form which will further reduce the value of the land for daughters. So how do we distribute this property?  Question 10 – Selling the entire property will give all the stake holders full value of the property as well as the property can be divided equally to all the stake holders as the distribution will be done in the form of money. However it is next to impossible to divide the House (built portion) & empty portion of the land equally among the stake holders of the property; 2 out of 4 stake holders are planning to sell their portion. The 2 stake holders who wants to sell has 40% (approximately) stake in the total property. Also there could be discrepancy because everyone will try to take the front portion of the land i.e. facing road side as it will fetch more value.  Please advise how do we proceed further.