Home » Hanafi Fiqh » Askimam.org » Is corporal punishment allowed and applicable according to Sharī`ah?

Is corporal punishment allowed and applicable according to Sharī`ah?

Answered as per Hanafi Fiqh by Askimam.org

Is corporal punishment allowed and applicable according to Sharī`ah?

Answer

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.

Corporal punishment refers to physical punishment inflicted on a child by an adult in authority.[1] The concept of corporal punishment has been (and still remains) a topic of debate amongst many people worldwide. In order to understand the Islamic stance on corporal punishment, we shall commence by quoting a hadīth of the Holy Prophet ﷺ:

قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «مُرُوا أَوْلَادَكُمْ بِالصَّلَاةِ وَهُمْ أَبْنَاءُ سَبْعِ سِنِينَ، وَاضْرِبُوهُمْ عَلَيْهَا، وَهُمْ أَبْنَاءُ عَشْرٍ وَفَرِّقُوا بَيْنَهُمْ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ»

The Messenger of Allah () said: Command your children to pray when they become seven years old, and beat them for it (prayer) when they become ten years old; and arrange their beds (to sleep) separately.[2]

In relation to this hadīth and the ruling derived therefrom, `Allāmah al-Haskafī states in Al-Durr Al-Mukhtār:

 (Tumurtāshī says:) “It (Prayer) is obligatory on every mukallaf person (i.e. one who is liable in Sharī`ah to adhere to its dictates) even though it is necessary to hit a ten year old (child) for it with a hand, not with a stick” because of the hadīth “command your children to pray…” I say that fasting is similar to prayer as well as related in the chapter of Fasting of Quhustānī…it is (also) related in (the chapter of) Hazr (wa’l-Ibāhah) of al-Ikhtiyār: He (the child) will be commanded to fast and pray and he will (also) be forbidden from drinking alcohol so he becomes accustomed to good and leaves evil.”[3]

`Allāmah Ibn Ābidīn comments on the last portion of `Allāmah Haskafī’s statement as follows: “The reason for narrating these two statements (from Quhustānī and Al-Ikhtiyār) is to show that a child may be commanded to do all things we are commanded to do and forbidden from all things we are prohibited to do.”[4]

Commenting on the nature of the hitting itself, `Allāmah al-`Alqamī states in his al-Kawkab al-Munīr (as quoted by Mubārakpūrī in his Tuhfat al-Ahwadhī): “The beating (in the hadīth) refers to a beating that does not inflict severe pain where the person avoids hitting the face as well.”[5]

From this, we can see that the hadīth above may be a direct indication towards the general permission of applying a nominal amount of physical force against a child for disciplinary reasons. Although the addressees of this hadīth are the parents[6], the general ruling may include teachers as well if permitted by the parents to do so as mentioned by `Allāmah Ibn Ābidīn (quoting from al-Qunyah)[7], Al-Usrūshnī (in his Jāmi` Ahkām al-Sighār)[8], and `Allāmah Ibn Nujaym[9] (in his Al-Bahr al-Rāiq).

It goes without saying that simply because Sharī`ah has allowed corporal punishment to be inflicted, one may not use it to infer that every sort of beating to any extent is permissible. The fuqahā’ and senior scholars of our times have laid down certain guidelines and rules that must be adhered to in this regard. We shall reiterate a few of those guidelines below:[10]

1) There should be a genuine need to discipline the child[11]

2) It should not lead to causing severe physical harm to the child

3) It should not result in the child holding ill feelings

4) It should not lead to the child running away

5) For a teacher, he should have permission from the child’s guardian

6) The hitting should be limited to the extent needed to discipline the child and nothing more

7) The hitting should not be such that the child is unable to endure it

8) The use of sticks is prohibited (i.e. one may only use one’s hands)[12]

9) The face and head must be avoided

10) One may not hit out of anger or to take revenge for something the child did

Although corporal punishment is permitted in Sharī`ah, it is incumbent on us to remember that this is not the ideal way of dealing with children, especially when the general attitude of the Holy Messenger of Allāh ﷺ was that of mercy and compassion towards all age groups. It is reported in Jāmi` al-Tirmidhī and Sunan Abī Dawūd (with a slight variance in wording) that the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said:

لَيْسَ مِنَّا مَنْ لَمْ يَرْحَمْ صَغِيرَنَا وَيَعْرِفْ شَرَفَ كَبِيرِنَا 

He is not one of us who does not have mercy upon our young, nor recognizes the honor of our elders.[13] 

The above discussion summarizes the general view on corporal punishment in the light of Sharī`ah; however, there are a few more technicalities that we need to consider before we conclude, namely the legal aspect behind the application of such an act in accordance to local, federal, and international law. 

In terms of international law, there is no such treaty or agreement that sanctions or prohibits corporal punishment at a global scale. Countries such as the US (and its individual states) also differ on the issue, especially in terms of application of corporal punishment in schools.[14] The latest bill (H.R. 5005) for ending corporal punishment in the US is yet to be received by the House or Senate[15], while 19 states still permit corporal punishment in schools[16]. On the other hand, corporal punishment has been outlawed in South Africa for quite some time even though individual schools still resort to hitting children for disciplinary purposes.[17] Chapter 2, section 10 of the South African Schools Act (no. 84) states[18]:

1) No person may administer corporal punishment at a school to a learner.

2) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a sentence, which could be imposed for assault.

As residents of our individual countries, it is incumbent on us to follow the laws of such countries as long as they do not directly conflict with Sharī’ah. [19] This is apparent from the following command of the Holy Prophet ﷺ:

عَلَى الْمَرْءِ الْمُسْلِمِ السَّمْعُ وَالطَّاعَةُ فِيمَا أَحَبَّ وَكَرِهَ، إِلَّا أَنْ يُؤْمَرَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ، فَإِنْ أُمِرَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ، فَلَا سَمْعَ وَلَا طَاعَةَ 

A Muslim must listen to and obey (the order of his leader) in things that he likes or dislikes, as long as he is not ordered to commit a sin. If he is ordered to disobey Allah, then there is no listening and no obedience. [20] 

Before we continue, it is important to highlight a few points regarding our current Madāris and Dārul `Ulūms. In the context of teachers in these institutions, it is important for us to tread carefully when dealing with situations requiring punitive action. In the past, some teachers were charged and successfully prosecuted for assaulting children. This not only involved intervention from child protection agencies, but it also defamed the name of Islamic institutions by causing attention from the media.[21] It is for these reasons that certain institutions have introduced employment contracts that bar the teacher from practicing corporal punishment. In some places such as the UK, many have lobbied cases to introduce nation-wide codes of conduct for Madāris.[22]

It is important to take note that if a teacher is made to sign a contract outlining the terms of employment whereby the teacher is prohibited to exercise corporal punishment against a student, then the teacher will be contractually bound to fulfill such terms from the standpoint of Sharī`ah.[23] More importantly, since we are living in an era fueled by secularism where traditionalist ideas are slowly fading away, it is the job of Muslim teachers to keep the masses close to Islam and avoid anything that will avert them from it. In our modern times, many parents are looking for teachers who show kindness and love to their students and further help them reach their goals through mercy and compassion. Often a teacher has to resort to corporal punishment because he did not employ more practical ways to keep the student focused on his studies. As such, resorting to such methods may also be a sign of weakness on the part of the teacher himself.

To sum it all up, the crux of our discussion boils down to the following points:

1) According to Sharī`ah, corporal punishment is allowed to a certain extent provided it is backed by legitimate reasons and restricted to the guidelines stated before.

2) The purpose of corporal punishment is simply to discipline the child and not to infringe on his or her rights. Furthermore, the ideal way to conduct ourselves with children is to show mercy by emulating the characteristics of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ.

3) As residents living under the protection of our individual countries, it is our duty to respect the laws of such countries and further ourselves from anything that may bring harm to ourselves and make it more difficult for us to practice our religion. As such, if the laws of one’s country permits one to apply corporal punishment, then one may do so in accordance to said laws of such a country and the guidelines stipulated by Sharī`ah. On the other hand, if one’s country (or state) does not permit such an act, then one should abide by the laws of the locality, lest one ends up in a situation that will force him to sacrifice other religious obligations due to one’s own inability to practice self-control.

In conclusion, while the legality of corporal punishment is established in Sharī`ah, we are still bound to adhere to the general guidelines and rules set out by Islamic law and avoid any situation that may have a negative impact on us or other Muslims within our communities. All in all, one must deal with such delicate issues with wisdom and sound judgment while taking one’s individual environment into account as well.

And Allah Ta’āla Knows Best

Bilal Mohammad

Student Darul Iftaa
New Jersey, USA 

Checked and Approved by,
Mufti Ebrahim Desai.

www.daruliftaa.net


[1] “Corporal Punishment”, Dictionary.com, accessed on August 31, 2014

[2] Abū Dāwūd, 495, The Book of Prayer; Tirmidhī, 401, The Chapters of Prayer, with variance in wording and chain of transmission.

[3] Radd Al-Muhtār, v. 1 p. 350-351, H.M. Sa`īd Company

[قال الحصكفي] (هِيَ فَرْضُ عَيْنٍ عَلَى كُلِّ مُكَلَّفٍ)… (وَإِنْ وَجَبَ ضَرْبُ ابْنِ عَشْرٍ عَلَيْهَا بِيَدٍ لَا بِخَشَبَةٍ) لِحَدِيثِ «مُرُوا أَوْلَادَكُمْ بِالصَّلَاةِ وَهُمْ أَبْنَاءُ سَبْعٍ، وَاضْرِبُوهُمْ عَلَيْهَا وَهُمْ أَبْنَاءُ عَشْرٍ» قُلْت وَالصَّوْمُ كَالصَّلَاةِ عَلَى الصَّحِيحِ كَمَا فِي صَوْمِ الْقُهُسْتَانِيِّ مَعْزِيًّا لِلزَّاهِدِيِّ وَفِي حَظْرِ الِاخْتِيَارِ أَنَّهُ يُؤْمَرُ بِالصَّوْمِ وَالصَّلَاةِ وَيُنْهَى عَنْ شُرْبِ الْخَمْرِ لِيَأْلَفَ الْخَيْرَ وَيَتْرُكَ الشَّرَّ

[4] Radd al-Muhtār, v. 1 p. 352, H.M. Sa`īd Company

[5] Tuhfat al-Ahwadhī, v. 3 p. 727, Maktaba Nazār Mustafā al-Bāz

إِنَّمَا أَمَرَ بِالضَّرْبِ لِعَشْرٍ لِأَنَّهُ حَدٌّ يُتَحَمَّلُ فِيهِ الضَّرْبُ غَالِبًا وَالْمُرَادُ بِالضَّرْبِ ضَرْبًا غَيْرَ مُبَرِّحٍ وَأَنْ يَتَّقِيَ الْوَجْهَ فِي الضَّرْبِ 

[6] Radd al-Muhtār, v. 4 p. 78, H.M. Sa`īd Company

(قَوْلُهُ وَالْأَبُ يُعَزِّرُ الِابْنَ عَلَيْهِ) أَيْ عَلَى تَرْكِ الصَّلَاةِ. وَمِثْلُهَا الصَّوْمُ كَمَا صَرَّحُوا بِهِ، وَتَعْلِيلُ الْقُنْيَةِ الْآتِي يُفِيدُ أَنَّ الْأُمَّ كَالْأَبِ

[7] Radd al-Muhtār, v. 4 p. 78, H.M. Sa`īd Company

(قَوْلُهُ وَفِي الْقُنْيَةِ إلَخْ) وَفِيهَا عَنْ الرَّوْضَةِ: وَلَوْ أَمَرَ غَيْرَهُ بِضَرْبِ عَبْدِهِ حَلَّ لِلْمَأْمُورِ ضَرْبُهُ، بِخِلَافِ الْحُرِّ.

قَالَ: فَهَذَا تَنْصِيصٌ عَلَى عَدَمِ جَوَازِ ضَرْبِ وَلَدِ الْآمِرِ بِأَمْرِهِ، بِخِلَافِ الْمُعَلِّمِ؛ لِأَنَّ الْمَأْمُورَ يَضْرِبُهُ نِيَابَةً عَنْ الْأَبِ لِمَصْلَحَةٍ وَالْمُعَلِّمَ يَضْرِبُهُ بِحُكْمِ الْمِلْكِ بِتَمْلِيكِ أَبِيهِ لِمَصْلَحَةِ الْوَلَدِ اهـ وَهَذَا إذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ الضَّرْبُ فَاحِشًا كَمَا يَأْتِي فِي الْمَتْنِ قَرِيبًا

[8] Jāmi` Ahkām al-Sighār, v. 2 p. 167, Dār al-Fadīlah

والأب أو الوصي إذا سلم الصغير إلي معلم ليعلمه القرآن، أو عملا آخر، فضربه المعلم للتعليم، إن ضربه بإذن الأب حيث حيث يضرب مثلما يضرب للتعليم فلا ضمان علي الأب والوصي، ولا علي المعلم.

[9] Al-Bahr al-Rāiq, v. 8 p. 344, H.M. Sa`īd Company

قُلْتُ: لِمُحَمَّدٍ إنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ الْأَبُ قَالَ لَهُ فِي أَمْرِ الضَّرْبِ شَيْئًا قَالَ يَضْمَنُ الْمُعَلِّمُ وَفِي رِوَايَةٍ فِي بَعْضِ النُّسَخِ إنَّ ضَرْبَ الصَّغِيرِ إنَّمَا يُضْمَنُ عَلَى قَوْلِ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ إذَا كَانَ لِلتَّأْدِيبِ أَمَّا إذَا ضَرَبَهُ لِتَعْلِيمِ الْقُرْآنِ لَا يَضْمَنُ كَالْمُعَلِّمِ، فَإِذًا لَا فَرْقَ بَيْنَ ضَرْبِ الْمُعَلِّمِ بِإِذْنِ الْأَبِ وَبَيْنَ ضَرْبِ الْأَبِ إذَا كَانَ لِلتَّعْلِيمِ…وَفِي كِتَابِ الْعِلَلِ لِلزَّوْجِ أَنْ يَضْرِبَ امْرَأَتَهُ عَلَى تَرْكِ الصَّلَاةِ وَلِلْأَبِ أَنْ يَضْرِبَ ابْنَهُ عَلَى تَرْكِ الصَّلَاةِ وَذَكَرَ مَسْأَلَةَ الْمُعَلِّمِ إذَا ضَرَبَ الصَّغِيرَ بِإِذْنِ الْأَبِ عَلَى الِاتِّفَاقِ قَالَ نَحْوَ مَا ذَكَرْنَا قَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ ثَمَّةَ وَهَذَا عِنْدَنَا.

[10] Fatāwā Mahmūdiyyah, v. 14 p. 126-129, Dārul Iftā Jāmi`ah Fārūqiyyah;

Imdādul Ahkām, v. 4 p. 425, Maktabah Dārul `Uloom Karachi;

Fatāwā Haqqāniyyah, v. 2 p. 117, Jāmi`ah Dārul `Uloom Haqqāniyyah;

Fatāwā Mufti Mahmūd, v. 11 p. 40-41

[11] Radd al-Muhtār, v. 4 p. 78, H.M. Sa`īd Company

(قَوْلُهُ وَفِي الْقُنْيَةِ إلَخْ) وَفِيهَا عَنْ الرَّوْضَةِ: وَلَوْ أَمَرَ غَيْرَهُ بِضَرْبِ عَبْدِهِ حَلَّ لِلْمَأْمُورِ ضَرْبُهُ، بِخِلَافِ الْحُرِّ.

قَالَ: فَهَذَا تَنْصِيصٌ عَلَى عَدَمِ جَوَازِ ضَرْبِ وَلَدِ الْآمِرِ بِأَمْرِهِ، بِخِلَافِ الْمُعَلِّمِ؛ لِأَنَّ الْمَأْمُورَ يَضْرِبُهُ نِيَابَةً عَنْ الْأَبِ لِمَصْلَحَةٍ وَالْمُعَلِّمَ يَضْرِبُهُ بِحُكْمِ الْمِلْكِ بِتَمْلِيكِ أَبِيهِ لِمَصْلَحَةِ الْوَلَدِ اهـ وَهَذَا إذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ الضَّرْبُ فَاحِشًا كَمَا يَأْتِي فِي الْمَتْنِ قَرِيبًا

[12] Radd al-Muhtār, v. 1 p. 352, H.M Sa`īd Company

(قَوْلُهُ: لَا بِخَشَبَةٍ) أَيْ عَصًا، وَمُقْتَضَى قَوْلِهِ بِيَدٍ أَنْ يُرَادَ بِالْخَشَبَةِ مَا هُوَ الْأَعَمُّ مِنْهَا وَمِنْ السَّوْطِ أَفَادَهُ ط.

(قَوْلُهُ: لِحَدِيثِ إلَخْ) اسْتِدْلَالٌ عَلَى الضَّرْبِ الْمُطْلَقِ، وَأَمَّا كَوْنُهُ لَا بِخَشَبَةٍ فَلِأَنَّ الضَّرْبَ بِهَا وَرَدَ فِي جِنَايَةِ الْمُكَلَّفِ. اهـ.

[13] Tirmidhī, 1920, Chapter regarding mercy with youngsters; Abū Dāwūd, 4943, Chapter regarding mercy

[14] “USA”, End Corporal Punishment, accessed on August 31, 2014, http://www.endcorporalpunishment.org/pages/progress/reports/usa.html

“U.S.: Corporal Punishment and Paddling Statistics by State and Race”, StopHitting.com, accessed on August 31, 2014

[15] “H.R. 5005”, GovTrack, accessed on September 01, 2014, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr5005

[16] Adwar, Corey, “These Are The 19 States That Still Let Public Schools Hit Kids”, Business Insider, accessed on September 01, 2014, http://www.businessinsider.com/19-states-still-allow-corporal-punishment-2014-3

[17] “Corporal punishment reflects society”, News24, accessed on September 01, 2014, http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Corporal-punishment-reflects-society-dpt-20140529

[18] “South African Schools Act, 1996”, Acts Online, accessed on September 01, 2014, http://www.acts.co.za/south-african-schools-act-1996/index.html?no_fee_schools.php

[19] Aap Ke Masaail Aur Unka Hal, v. 8, pg. 165, Maktabah Ludhanwiyyah;

Fatawa Mahmudiyyah, vol. 4, pg. 570, Darul Iftaa Jami’ah Faruqiyyah;

Ibid., vol. 23, pg. 478;

Ibid., vol. 10, pg. 448;

Ahsanul Fatawa, vol. 8, pg. 217, H.M. Saeed Company;

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ فَإِنْ تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذَلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا

و قال ابن خويزمنداد: و أما طاعة السلطان تجب فيما كان لله فيه طاعة، و لا تجب فيما كان لله فيه معصية

(الجامع لأحكام القرآن، ج ٣، ص ٢٢٩، دار الحديث)؛

مطلب تجب طاعة الإمام فيما ليس بمعصية

قال في الظهيرية: وهو تأويل ما روي عن أبي يوسف ومحمد فإنهما فعلا ذلك لأن هارون أمرهما أن يكبرا بتكبير جده ففعلا ذلك امتثالا له لا مذهبا واعتقادا قال في المعراج لأن طاعة الإمام فيما ليس بمعصية واجبة اه

(رد المحتار علي الدر المختار، ج ٢، ص ١٧٢، ايج ايم سعيد كمبني)؛

وتجب طاعة الإمام عادلا كان أو جائرا إذا لم يخالف الشرع

(رد المحتار علي الدر المختار، ج ٤، ص ٢٦٣)؛

مطلب في وجوب طاعة الإمام (قوله: افترض عليه إجابته) والأصل فيه قوله تعالى {وأولي الأمر منكم} وقال – صلى الله عليه وسلم – «اسمعوا وأطيعوا ولو أمر عليكم عبد حبشي أجدع» وروي «مجدع» وعن ابن عمر أنه – عليه الصلاة والسلام – قال «عليكم بالسمع والطاعة لكل من يؤمر عليكم ما لم يأمركم بمنكر» ففي المنكر لا سمع ولا طاعة

(رد المحتار علي الدر المختار، ج ٤، ص ٢٦٥)

[20] Sahih Muslim, 1839, The Book on Governance

[21] “Reform call as madrassa teacher guilty of child cruelty”, BBC News, accessed on September 04, 2014, http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lancashire-19519444;

Pintu, Sharifuzzaman, Madrasa student chained for misbehaviour”, Khabar South Asia, accessed on September 04, 2014, http://khabarsouthasia.com/en_GB/articles/apwi/articles/features/2012/03/05/feature-01

[22] Wintour, Patrick, “Code of conduct drawn up for UK madrasas”, The Guardian, accessed on September 04, 2014, http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/18/code-of-conduct-uk-madrasas

[23] المادة ٤٥٥: تكون المنفعة معلومة في استيجار اهل الصنعة بببيان العمل يعني بتعيين ما يعمل الأجير أو تعيين كيفية عمله

[قال الأتاسي]  يعني أن معلومية المنفعة في استيجار اهل الصنعة إنما تكون ببيان العمل بيانا يرفع الجهالة المؤدية الي المنازعة

(شرح المجلة، ج ٢ ص ٥٣٢-٥٣٨، مكتبة رشيدية)

[قال الحصكفي](وَ) يُعْلَمُ النَّفْعُ أَيْضًا بِبَيَانِ (الْعَمَلِ كَالصِّيَاغَةِ وَالصِّبْغِ وَالْخِيَاطَةِ)

(رد المحتار علي الدر المختار، ج ٦ ص ٩، ايج ايم سعيد كمبني)

والأجير الخاص من يتقبل العمل من واحد ، وإنما يعرف استحقاق الأجر بالعمل على العبارة الأولى بإيقاع العقد على العمل كما لو استأجر خياطا ليخيط له هذا الثوب بدرهم أو استأجر قصارا ليقصر له هذا الثوب بدرهم ، وإنما يعرف استحقاق الأجر بتسليم النفس وبمضي المدة بإيقاع العقد على المدة.

(الفتاوى الهندية، ج ٤ ص ٥٠٠، مكتبه رشيديه)

كُلُّ مَا كَانَ مِنْ تَوَابِعِ الْعَمَلِ فِي الْإِجَارَةِ الْوَاقِعَةِ عَلَى الْعَمَلِ , وَلَمْ يُشْتَرَطْ عَلَى الْأَجِيرِ يُعْتَبَرُ فِيهِ عُرْفُ الْبَلَدِ الَّذِي عُقِدَتْ فِيهِ الْإِجَارَةُ , وَالْمَادَّتَانِ ٥٥٤ و ٥٧٥ مُتَفَرِّعَتَانِ عَنْ هَذِهِ الْمَادَّةِ (اُنْظُرْ الْمَادَّةَ ٣٧).

[قال علي حيدر] وَقَدْ قَالُوا فِي تَوَابِعِ الْعُقُودِ الَّتِي لَا ذِكْرَ لِلشُّرُوطِ فِيهَا إنَّهَا تُحْمَلُ عَلَى عَادَةِ كُلِّ بَلَدٍ كَالسِّلْكِ عَلَى الْخَيَّاطِ وَالدَّقِيقِ الَّذِي يُصْلِحُ الْحَائِكُ بِهِ الثَّوْبَ عَلَى رَدِّ الثَّوْبِ وَإِدْخَالِ الْحِنْطَةِ الْمَنْزِلَ عَلَى الْمَكَّارِي بِخِلَافِ الصُّعُودِ بِهَا إلَى الْغُرْفَةِ أَوْ السَّطْحِ وَالْإِكَافُ عَلَى رَبِّ الدَّابَّةِ وَالْحِبَالُ وَالْجَوَالِقُ عَلَى مَا تَعَارَفُوهُ (رَدُّ الْمُحْتَارِ)

درر الحكام شرح مجلة الأحكام، ج ١ ص ٦٠٢، دار الكتب العلمية

This answer was collected from Askimam.org, which is operated under the supervision of Mufti Ebrahim Desai from South Africa.

Read answers with similar topics: